Okay so Alan bought something he wasn't sure what it was...
Moderator: snoopdog
- KrazyPlace
- Astrea snail
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 4:25 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
- danielmiller82
- Bristleworm
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:45 pm
- Location: Pensacola, FL
- Contact:
the guy at WW has said that it is galaxea...a very new frag..but galaxea none the less...
look at these links....
http://www.reefs.org/library/farmertodd/frag/lps/2.htm
http://www.globaldialog.com/~jrice/cora ... galaxy.htm
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/oculinidae.htm
You can do a search under Galaxea or Galaxy Coral or Crystal Coral
look at these links....
http://www.reefs.org/library/farmertodd/frag/lps/2.htm
http://www.globaldialog.com/~jrice/cora ... galaxy.htm
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/oculinidae.htm
You can do a search under Galaxea or Galaxy Coral or Crystal Coral
- harbingerofthefish
- Copepod
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 2:55 pm
- Location: ^^Harbinger wishes he was way up here^^ - um...can we say abuse of power here?! and memphis, tn ;)
- Contact:
I think the difference is that galaxies generally have a more plating skelatal structure with shorter skeletal stems. The thing I have seems to have more of a skeleton ala a blastomussa.
When closed a galaxy's skeleton generally apears more smooth compared to other LPS. By smooth I mean the bulk of it is one solid mass as oppossed to a group of branches.
i emailed the people from your first link to see where they got there I dentification and if they had sweeper or co=losed skeltal pics.
no reply so far.
When closed a galaxy's skeleton generally apears more smooth compared to other LPS. By smooth I mean the bulk of it is one solid mass as oppossed to a group of branches.
i emailed the people from your first link to see where they got there I dentification and if they had sweeper or co=losed skeltal pics.
no reply so far.
"nothing is the matter, it don't matter what you think"